Monday, November 30, 2015

SO MANY ROUGH DRAFTS



Since I figure you just cannot get enough of them drafts tho, I decided to post my slightly more optimistically viewed new rough draft. It may be my feverish head causing that though, so for those of you who worry that I have lost my old cynical self, don't worry. I'll be back.




Imagine a world without writing. It wouldn’t have had Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches, it wouldn’t have had the Arab Spring, nor would it have had the elected leaders around the world. Writing is regarded by many as a tranquil activity, something that calm people do, but what many seem to forget is that writing is the key element behind most of the major changes in both ancient and modern society. Writing is a powerful weapon many overlook in today’s struggle for justice, even though it is right under their noses. The force of it tends to be forgotten and the idea that writing creates the base for rhetoric - the persuasive element that is the foundation for change - does not generally come across as apparent. Writing is there, however,  and it really does make a change when used properly within the right framework. Documentary filmmaking is one of these forums where writing truly shows its form as a carving tool used to shape the ideas that will bring changes in the world.
Thea Mercouffer was born and raised in Romania but escaped to the United States with her family from the communist dictatorship in 1987 (Thea, n.d.). Mercouffer moved to Los Angeles and there continued pursuing her great passion in life: Acting and Directing. Meanwhile, she was on the board of a big organization and when they asked her if she could write and direct a series of films about sexual assault she states in an interview with me that she “fell into” documentary filmmaking. Mercouffer took on the challenge to direct the film, going straight from only having directed theater in the past. She then continued on making a film about human trafficking, and Mercouffer found that she “really enjoyed making documentary films so [she] stuck with it”. That was 13 years ago. Today, Thea Mercouffer is a renowned documentary filmmaker with a kind heart and a warm spirit.
Mercouffer is one of those who use writing to change the world she lives in, and she does so through her documentary films. Her latest project clearly shows how using words to one’s advantage truly can make a difference. It all started when she realized that the Los Angeles River going through her home city was not deemed navigable, and therefore not under the protection of the Clean Water Act. Mercouffer’s husband George Wolfe decided to travel fifty-one miles and show the EPA (the United States Environmental Protection Agency) that the river was, truly, navigable (Press release, n.d.). Mercouffer decided to document this act of civil disobedience, and that created the foundation for her award-winning documentary Rock the Boat. The issue with documentaries however, is that in order to be able to make them one needs money, and money has to be asked for. This is where the building blocks of writing used to support world-changing ideas come into play. Mercouffer had to convince sponsors that her documentary was worth their time and effort through a documentary treatment, a short document which describes the intention of the film as well as sets the tone for the production. Mercouffer, being an artist, found this extremely challenging since often times the primary idea of the project does not necessarily mirror the finalized product. Not only did she have to try to accomplish that task, but she also had to be able to write in a way that would make the reader understand the importance of the completion of her project, and as stated by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein “…writers who fail to show that others should care or already do care about their claims will ultimately lose their audiences’ interest” (2010, p. 93). Mercouffer’s whole film depended on her being able to write in the right way for her audience.
Mercouffer had to apply for sponsorships, and she tells the story of how one has to be endearing when needed, as well as strict and formal in other settings (interview, 2015). In a the opening sentence of a sponsorship letter sent by Mercouffer’s producer for Rock the Boat, one can understand the fine line that needs to be balanced in order to successfully receive support:

“Dear Rob,

Our mutual friend, John McLaughlin, suggested I write to you directly about Rock the Boat – the documentary about the Los Angeles River, which I’m producing. We’re raising the final finishing funds, a bit less than $30,000. John and Susan have contributed and think that, given your interest in the river and environmental activism, you might like to participate, too” (Sponsorship, n.d.).

            What Randi Johnson, producer of Rock the Boat, shows here is that an application for funding does not need to be extremely formal, even though he does not directly know the person he is asking for financial support. Mercouffer does explain, however, that it is when one applies for grants it is extremely important to follow the guidelines given, and that it can sometimes be an very tiring thing to write the applications, since they are quite intricate and often fruitless attempts (interview, 2015). 
Just as it was important for Mercouffer to write to her audience, she also had to make sure that people would care about the issue she was trying to shed some light upon. Mercouffer had Kairos on her side - the idea that within what timeframe one delivers a message is as equally important as the content of that message (Losh & Alexander, 2013) - and in a time where the public was becoming more and more concerned about water it couldn’t have been better. Another important factor was exigence, and as stated by Laura Carroll: “Understanding the exigence is important because it helps you begin to discover the purpose of the rhetoric. It helps you understand what the discourse is trying to accomplish” (2010, p. 49). Exigence, which goes hand in hand with Kairos, means the surrounding events that forces someone to speak up. Mercouffer was affected by the exigence since that she lived in drought-stricken California.
            Another crucial part of making a documentary film is the legal documents that need to be in order. When conducting an interview one needs their consent to use the footage captured during the interview, and forgetting to get their signature on those papers can make or break a documentary before it has even started to come together. One also needs to get proper paper work filled out in order to receive the permission to film in certain areas, and in that can sometimes cause issues when they have not been meticulously filled out in the correct way. An example of this kind of writing is a Crowd Release, which is a legal disclaimer for a location where people may show up in the frame
“By entering and by your presence here, you consent to be photographed, filmed and/or otherwise recorded. Your entry constitutes your consent to such photography, filming and/or recording and to any use, in any and all media throughout the universe in perpetuity, of your appearance, voice and name for any purpose whatsoever in connection with the production presently entitled: _______________________.
You understand that all photography, filming and/or recording will be done in reliance on this consent given by you by entering this area.
If you do not agree to the foregoing, please do not enter this area” (Bennet, 2009).
The same goes for the use of music and other copyrighted material such as logos or brand names. When making a documentary film it is crucial to be able to understand and write in legal terms in order to not get confused in a world filled with jargon. Janet Boyd explains that “Jargon is the terminology used by those in a particular profession or group to facilitate clear and precise communication” (2011, p. 89), which could be quite counterintuitive since jargon has in many instances increased confusion rather than decreased it.
            Even though a massive part of the creation of a documentary revolves around disclaimers and asking for money, the creative process is also highly dependent on writing. Documentaries may not seem dramatic in the same way as a play or a regular movie, but the creator still has to make sure that the storytelling is unique, and that the film has an arch that it follows. Mercouffer states that since she had written many manuscripts for theater before she got involved in documentary filmmaking she knew what she was doing, but that the factual and educational foundation had to be more extensive (Interview, 2015). While writing the script the writer creates a storyline and the film begins to form a skeleton, one could say. It is around this skeleton the rest of the documentary will come together, even though the main storyline may change during the creative process. When the base for the documentary has been filmed, the skeleton will work so that one can easily see what pieces are missing for it to become a whole body. 
            Understanding the importance of writing in documentary may not seem to be a priority to many, but maybe it should be. Even though documentary filmmaking is a narrow niche the construction of the end product can be applied to most anything. In order to make a change in this world, one needs to understand the power of writing. Not only inspirational writing but also what is considered dull writing at times. The legal documents, the press releases, the grant requests. They all play a major roll in order to create something that will move people into a direction where they will help change the world and make it a better place. It seems strange that a futile legal disclaimer could ever make a difference, but when all these components, be it disclaimers, sponsorship letters, or a draft for a script, come together they will create a mighty river of what was once mere streams.
           


References
Bennet, T. (2009, April 17). Crowd Release | JD Supra. Retrieved from
http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/crowd-release-44788/
Boyd, J. (2011). Murder! (Rhetorically Speaking). In Writing spaces: Readings on
writing. (Vol. 1, p. 89). Anderson, South Carolina.: Parlor Press.
Carrol, L. (2010). Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis. In
Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Vol. 1, p. 49).
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2010). "So What? Who Cares? In They say / I say: The
moves that matter in academic writing (2nd ed., p. 93). New York: W.W. Norton &.
Interview with Thea Mercouffer, November 4, 2015
Johnson, R., Sponsorship Proposal Rock The Boat (n.d.)
Losh, E., & Alexander, J. (2013). Why Rhetoric? In Understanding rhetoric: A graphic
guide to writing (1st ed., p. 46).
Rock The Boat Press Release (n.d.)
Thea Mercouffer - director and producer of Rock the Boat. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.theamercouffer.com/

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Metacognitive reflection, part 1


Here I sit, ravaged by the seasonal cold as well as having gone through the worst migraine attack for most of the day. But I have started writing the reflection paper. If it does not makes sense however, it is because my head is filled with cotton and I can't really see straight. I have written about half I think, and I need to add more but for now I just don't have the mental energy.

            I have been ever so frustrated throughout this course. Not because of it lacking interesting material, on the contrary, but because it has truly challenged me in many ways. I have a lot of issues with uncertainty, and I have been uncertain for the majority of the class. Uncertain of what the outcome would be, uncertain of how I was going to achieve my goal, uncertain of my own abilities as a writer. I know how to write, but I only know it if I’m allowed to do it in my own way. I see that that could be an issue, since I need to learn how to be less stubborn, and how to adapt to different genres. I also need to learn how to analyze my own writing, instead of simply putting it down when I’m done and refusing to read it through properly. I suppose I have the wonderful gift of being highly self-critical, and if I go through what I have produced I would only see the mistakes and the errors that I had made. Even so, I will try to write this reflection paper and thoroughly go through what I have learned, and not what I did wrong. What I need you, as a reader, to understand is how difficult that is for me.      
            In the beginning of the class I had a very hard time to understand what the end-product of the course would be, and I must admit that even though we are very close to the end I am still a bit confused. I have, however, been able to grasp the outlining idea of the task at hand, and I have decided to roll with it. Being a control-freak, I generally don’t do that. Referring to Shitty First Drafts, an article I have read before and that I both like and dislike, truly mirror my apprehension regarding the work in this class. Anne Lamott writes about how most good writing start with really shitty rough drafts, and that it takes a lot of work and self-doubting before anything of value is truly created (Lamott, 2005), and I totally understand that. But that is not how my brain works. I need to let my mind flow and then just write and write and write. I have in the past usually written all my large papers in one sitting, revising them only to find syntax errors or spelling mistakes, and it has worked for me. When I write that way I follow the train of thought and the final product makes sense. When I write in sessions, however, I find my writing to be blotchy and incomprehensible. Having to bring multiple rough drafts for the final paper has helped me overcome the fear I have for coming across as a bad writer, and I have written the darn drafts even though it rubs me the wrong way.
            Something that I have come to think about during the course as well is the fact that every move I make when writing has some kind of intent behind it. I might not see it, because I am to close to analyze it right away, but someone else could most likely see why I make the choices I do. I think learning about that, and reading about it in How To Read Like a Writer, have made me think more consciously about my writing. I have caught myself writing this paper stopping and thinking for a bit about what I want to portray in the text, who do I want people to see me as? I didn’t do that in the past, other than the occasional snicker when I thought I was being funny or ingenious, which many o times can seem quite obnoxious. No, this is different. I think that writing our blog-posts have helped, since they are casual yet academic work, so I had to find a balance there. I wanted to get the essence out of the assigned readings, while at the same time being approachable to the rest of the class. I can be the worst know-it-all at times, and I really did not want that to come across in the blog-posts.

Saturday, November 21, 2015

second shitty rough draft. Ugh.

Okay, so here goes... Second shitty rough draft. And I really don't think it is any better than the first one. My computer has been acting up, and therefore put me in a foul mood, leading to crappy writing with many holes in it. I have made it rain all through the text...$$



Writing is regarded by many as a tranquil activity, something that calm people do when they want to write poems, books, or papers for their education. What many seems to forget is that writing is the key element behind most of the major changes in modern society. Without writing the world wouldn’t have had Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches, it wouldn’t have had the Arab Spring, it wouldn’t have had the elected leaders around the world. Writing is a powerful weapon many overlook in today’s struggle for justice, even though it is right under their noses. Documentary filmmaking is one of these forums where writing shows its true form as a carving tool to shape the ideas that can bring changes in the world.
Thea Mercouffer was born and raised in Romania but escaped to the United States with her family from the communist dictatorship in 1987 (Thea). Mercouffer moved to Los Angeles and there continued pursuing her great passion in life: Acting and Directing. Meanwhile, she was on the board of a big organization and when they asked her if she could write and direct a series of films about sexual assault she “fell into” documentary filmmaking (Interview). Mercouffer took on the challenge to direct the film, going straight from only having directed theater (Interview). She then continued on making a film about human trafficking, and Mercouffer found that she “really enjoyed making documentary films so [she] stuck with it”. That was 13 years ago. Today, Thea Mercouffer is a  renowned documentary filmmaker with a kind heart and a warm spirit.
Mercouffer is one of those who use writing to change the world she lives in, And she does so through her documentary films. Her latest project clearly shows how using words to one’s advantage truly can make a difference. It all started when she realized that the Los Angeles River going through her home city was not deemed navigable, and therefore not under the protection of the Clean Water Act. Mercouffer’s husband George Wolfe decided to travel 51 miles and show the EPA that the river is, truly, navigable (Press release). Mercouffer decided to document this act of civil disobedience, and that created the foundation for her award-winning documentary Rock the Boat. The issue with documentaries however, is that in order to be able to create them one needs money. This is where the building blocks of writing used to support world-changing ideas come into play. Mercouffer had to convince sponsors that her documentary was worth their time and effort through a documentary treatment, which she found extremely challenging since a treatment sets the tone and style for the whole film (interview). She had to be able to write in a way that would make the reader understand the importance of the completion of her project, and as written in So What? Who Cares? “…writers who fail to show that others should care or already do care about their claims will ultimately lose their audiences’ interest” (Graff, 2010), Mercouffers whole film depended on her being able to write in the right way for her audience.
Thea Mercouffer also had to apply for sponsorships, and she tells the story of how one has to be endearing when needed, as well as strict and formal in other settings (interview). In a the opening sentence of a sponsorship letter sent by Mercouffer’s producer for Rock the Boat, one can understand the fine line that needs to be balanced in order to successfully receive support.
“Dear Rob,

Our mutual friend, John McLaughlin, suggested I write to you directly about Rock the Boat – the documentary about the Los Angeles River, which I’m producing. We’re raising the final finishing funds, a bit less than $30,000. John and Susan have contributed and think that, given your interest in the river and environmental activism, you might like to participate, too.” (Sponsorship)

            What Randi Johnson, producer of Rock the Boat, shows here is that an application for funding does not need to be extremely formal, even though he does not know the person he is asking for support. Mercouffer does explain, however, that it is when one applies for grants it is extremely important to follow the guidelines given, and that it can sometimes be an very tiring thing to write the applications, since they are quite intricate and often fruitless attempts (interview).  
$$$$$$$ MORE CONTENT HERE $$$$$$$$$$$$
            Another crucial part of making a documentary film is the legal documents that need to be in order. When conducting an interview one needs their consent to use the footage captured during the interview, and forgetting to get their signature on those papers can make or break a documentary before it has even started to come together. $$$$$$ GET EXAMPLE OF LEGAL DOCUMENT WRITING HERE $$$$$$$$$$$. One also needs to get proper paper work filled out in order to receive the permission to film in certain areas, and in that can sometimes cause issues when they have not been meticulously filled out in the correct way. An example of this kind of writing is a Crowd Release, which is a legal disclaimer for a location where people may show up in the frame
“By entering and by your presence here, you consent to be photographed, filmed and/or otherwise recorded. Your entry constitutes your consent to such photography, filming and/or recording and to any use, in any and all media throughout the universe in perpetuity, of your appearance, voice and name for any purpose whatsoever in connection with the production presently entitled: _______________________.
You understand that all photography, filming and/or recording will be done in reliance on this consent given by you by entering this area.
If you do not agree to the foregoing, please do not enter this area.” (Crowd Release, 2009).
The same goes for the use of music and other copyrighted material such as logos or brand names. When making a documentary film it is crucial to be able to understand and write in legal terms in order to not get confused in a world filled with jargon. $$$$$ INTRODUCE QUOTE $$$$$$$$$$$ “Jargon is the terminology used by those in a particular profession or group to facilitate clear and precise communication.” (Boyd, 2011).
            Even though a massive part of the creation of a documentary revolves around disclaimers and asking for money, the creative process is also highly depending on writing. Documentaries may not seem dramatic in the same way a play or a regular movie, but the creator still has to make sure that the storytelling is unique, and that the film has an arch that it follows. Mercouffer says that since she had written many scripts for theater before she got involved in documentary filmmaking she knew what she was doing, but that the factual foundation had to be more extensive. $$$$$$$$$ FIND GOOD MATERIAL IN INTERVIEW $$$$$$$$$$. While writing a script a storyline is created and the film begins to form a skeleton one could say. It is around this skeleton the rest of the documentary will come together, even though the main storyline may change during the creative process. When the base for the documentary has been filmed, the skeleton will work so that one can easily see what pieces are missing for it to become a whole body. ß DON’T LIKE THIS, REWORD REWORD REWORD (OR DELETE)……
            à WRITE ABOUT PRESS RELEASES
            à PUBLICITY MATERIALS







 NEED TO FORMAT SOURCES PROPERLY
           

http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/crowd-release-44788/
Interview with Thea Mercouffer
Sponsorship Proposal
Press Release
http://www.theamercouffer.com/
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2010). "So What? Who Cares? In They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (2nd ed., p. 93). New York: W.W. Norton &.

Boyd, J. (2011). Murder! (Rhetorically Speaking). In Writing spaces: Readings on writing. (Vol. 1, p. 89). Anderson, South Carolina.: Parlor Press.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

When your rough draft truly is shitty....

GAAAAAAHHH.

That is how I feel about my rough draft. I never write them, because I feel less of a writer when I do. I know it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, but I just want to be able to spit out what I want to say and be over with it. Just letting go of a thought that I'm stuck on and continuing to my next idea doesn't work well with me, and I am therefore dreading this experience of going over things I am not satisfied with over and over again. I have yet to figure out what readings we have done in the class that will adhere to my ideas, and I have yet to understand what I am really trying to say and how I am going to say it. Confused? Same here... I even went to a full on vegan cafe today in order to clean up my thoughts. And that only led to me eating a weird kale salad and drinking something they claimed to be coffee with almond milk in it...

What I need to know is if I am doing the analysis correctly. In my head I can sort of explain why I have chosen the route that I have, but since I do not feel as if I have any sense of what exactly I should be doing I might be completely off track. (Zack, if you're reading this, HELP).

I want to continue down the road I have started, but if it is because I have misunderstood the assignment, someone please stop me in my tracks right now so that I can re-evaluate and re-group my mental troops. Anyhow, anywho, anyway... My rough (ugh) draft is below. Please, whoever is reading this, be gentle on me in your head.



Writing is regarded by many as a tranquil activity, something that calm people do when they want to write poems, books, or papers for their education. What many seem to forget is that writing is the key element behind most of the major changes in modern society. Without writing the world wouldn’t have had Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches, it wouldn’t have had the Arab Spring, it wouldn’t have had the elected leaders around the world. Writing is a powerful weapon many overlook in today’s struggle for justice, even though it is right under their noses. Even though indirect, writing provide the tools needed to make a social impact and, as a result, begin to change the world.
Thea Mercouffer was born and raised in Romania but escaped to the United States with her family from the communist dictatorship in 1987 (Thea). Mercouffer moved to Los Angeles and there continued pursuing her great passion in life: Acting and Directing. Meanwhile, she was on the board of a big organization and when they asked her if she could write and direct a series of films about sexual assault she “fell into” documentary filmmaking (Interview). Mercouffer took on the challenge to direct the film, going straight from only having directed theater (Interview). She then continued on making a film about human trafficking, and Mercouffer found that she “really enjoyed making documentary films so [she] stuck with it”. That was 13 years ago. Today, Thea Mercouffer is a  renowned documentary filmmaker with a kind heart and a warm spirit.
Mercouffer is one of those who use writing to change the world she lives in. Her latest project clearly shows how using words to one’s advantage truly can make a difference. It all started when she realized that the Los Angeles River going through her home city was not deemed navigable, and therefore not under the protection of the Clean Water Act. Mercouffer’s husband George Wolfe decided to travel 51 miles and show the EPA that the river is, truly, navigable. Mercouffer decided to document the act of civil disobedience, and that created the foundation for her award-winning documentary Rock the Boat. The issue with documentaries however, is that in order to be able to create them one needs money. This is where the building blocks of writing used to support world-changing ideas come into play. Mercouffer had to convince sponsors that her documentary was worth their time and effort through a treatment, which she found extremely challenging since a treatment sets the tone and style for the whole film (interview). She also had to apply for sponsorships, and she tells the story of how one has to be endearing when needed, as well as strict and formal in other settings. In a the opening sentence in a sponsorship letter sent by Mercouffer’s producer, one can understand the fine line that needs to be balanced in order to successfully receive support.
Dear Rob,

Our mutual friend, John McLaughlin, suggested I write to you directly about Rock the Boat – the documentary about the Los Angeles River, which I’m producing. We’re raising the final finishing funds, a bit less than $30,000. John and Susan have contributed and think that, given your interest in the river and environmental activism, you might like to participate, too.” (Sponsorship)
            What Randi Johnson, producer of Rock the Boat, shows here is that an application for funding does not need to be extremely formal, even though he does not know the person he is asking for support. Mercouffer does explain, however, that it is when one applies for grants it is extremely important to follow the guidelines given.


Interview with Thea Mercouffer
Sponsorship Proposal
Press Release
http://www.theamercouffer.com/

Monday, November 9, 2015

So. The thesis is a tough one. I have thought about this back and fourth and I believe that it will have time to change about a million times before it's time to write the actual paper. This is however what I have so far:

--> Even though the goal may be the same, the style of writing will change depending on who the recipient is. For example the tone in a letter requesting a grant will be very different from a letter asking relatives for money.



I still have the feeling that I am doing everything wrong.



Marta.

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Happy sassy Saturday peeps!

I am still trying to figure out my thesis-statement(s) for Monday, but I'm getting a little more secure in how to do it. That being said I still feel quite confused... Well well, one cannot conquer the world in one quarter, right?


Let's get down to business though, shall we?

In "So What? Who Cares?" the author goes over how you make sure that your readers feel motivated to read what you write. Confused? No worries. Look at it this way: you are not going to be interested in just a list of facts, right? But if you would be convinced that what you are reading is important, and that it is important for you to read it, then your interest might be a little piqued. In the chapter we are instructed that if we do not explain why what we write matter, and why the reader should care, we risk losing the readers' interest early on in the text. As writers, we have to hook the reader early on, by talking about how our view on something is different from what they have read earlier, and by arguing why our view is important we draw the reader further in to our text. In order to make an argument, we first have to argue why our argument needs to read.

In "Argument beyond Pro and Con" we get to understand that an argument is most likely never black or white. Everything depends on context, who is involved, what has happened, and why it did. In order to give a proper argument, the goal is not to convince our audience that the other side is wrong, but to convince them that we are right. While taking into consideration the opposing view we can make our own arguments stronger by refuting their side and backing our own using properly grounded claims. One can look at it as having our backing, our grounds, being the bearing pillars and our claim, our argument, being the ceiling. Without proper pillars, the ceiling will cave in.

An argument is nothing without the proper backing, and if you are not able to back your claim, the only thing you have is a worthless statement. So back it up!

I'll be back with a couple of thesis statements, stay tuned.


Have a great weekend!

Marta





Sunday, November 1, 2015

Going at it, word by word



When reading "How to read like a writer" I found myself drifting off in a kind of daydreaming haze. When I read something that calls upon my reflective abilities I tend to phase out of the actual text and further into my own mind, right until i realize that I have gotten nowhere. My reaction to the text is quite divided. I do understand the point of stopping and analyzing what is going on in the text, while at the same time I hate it. Writing for me has never been drafting and redrafting and final drafting, I just have a really hard time doing that. The thing that happens when I read through something that I have written is that I find it to be completely useless and then I'll rewrite the whole thing. I know that seems like a lot of extra work, but the idea of changing only one paragraph in an already written piece is interrupting my train of thought. I suppose I just have to work on that... The thing is that my reading style is the same. I just have to flow through it, otherwise I'll get stuck and I just don't want to do it.

I do not feel comfortable with the idea of having people analyze my way of writing, since I don't do it myself. Ugh. *trying to step out of comfort zone*

Regarding the research based article, I found it useful but it didn't really excite me (quelle surprise). I had to change my interviewee so I read through the tips in order to see if there was anything new and interesting, but I shall not lie, I found it a little dusty. I will incorporate the technique into my Qs for the interview though.

My interviewee will be Thea Mercouffer, a teacher at Antioch as well as a documentary filmmaker.

1). How did you get started with documentary filmmaking?
- When was it?

2). Did you study anything regarding it?
- If yes, what? If no, why not?

3). Did you read any books about filmmaking?
- What did you read?

4). When did you write your first treatment? How did you do it?

5). What type of language do you think is important when writing a treatment? What is necessary to have and why?

6). When you started to try to find funding for your documentaries, how did you go at it?

7). Did you have to write any documents to try to get grants? What is necessary steps to take when writing those kinds of documents?

8). Where you denied grants or funding because of the way some things were written? Why do you think you were denied funds?

9). How many legal documents do you have to deal with when making a film? What kind of language is used in those documents, and do you think they could be written in a different way?

10). What is your creative process? Do you write a lot?

11). What kind of writing do you enjoy most within your profession? Why?

12.) What do you dislike the most? Why?

13). Are you working on a script right now? What is important to think about when writing one?